The passing of any public figure often ushers in a period of reflection, and for former Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari, his death has reignited debates about his legacy. While some advocate for forgiveness in the wake of his demise, a significant portion of the populace continues to hold him accountable for the challenges faced during his tenure. This isn’t about disrespecting the dead; it’s about establishing a crucial precedent for leadership and governance in Nigeria.
The argument that Buhari should be “forgiven” because he’s no longer with us often clashes with the deeply held belief that leaders, regardless of their earthly status, will ultimately account for their stewardship. Indeed, the very essence of leadership, particularly in a democracy, is the implicit contract between the leader and the led. When that trust is perceived to be broken, the demand for accountability doesn’t simply vanish with a leader’s passing.
The Promises of Change and the Weight of Expectations
Buhari’s journey to the presidency was marked by persistence, culminating in a victory during a period when Nigerians yearned for a departure from the status quo under the Goodluck Ebele Jonathan administration. The clamor for “change” was palpable, and Nigerians, perhaps overly optimistic, invested their hopes in a leader who had, for so long, been a symbol of integrity and discipline.
However, some now reflect on whether the initial trust placed in him, particularly given concerns about his educational background versus that of his predecessor, was misplaced. This isn’t an indictment of individuals, but a critical look at the electorate’s role in choosing its leaders and the criteria it prioritizes.
The Unforgiving Reality of Leadership
It’s difficult to fault Nigerians for their continued scrutiny. When a leader’s administration concludes with the nation seemingly worse off, and that leader ultimately seeks medical solace abroad rather than investing in the very healthcare system they presided over, it inevitably fuels public disillusionment.
The expectation is that leaders should prioritize and build up their own nation’s institutions, creating a robust system that serves all citizens, including themselves. The perceived failure to do so often leaves a bitter taste and reinforces the sentiment that accountability was sidestepped.
Democracy Demands Responsibility, Not Entitlement
Being president is a profound responsibility, not an inherited right. In a democratic system like Nigeria’s, public office is a trust, not a birthright. When a leader demonstrably fails to improve the lives of their constituents, the honorable path, in many mature democracies, is resignation.
The idea that a leader must cling to power, even when the country is visibly struggling under their watch, runs counter to democratic principles. After eight years, if the nation’s condition has deteriorated, the onus is on the leader to acknowledge shortcomings and, if necessary, pave the way for more competent leadership. The refusal to do so, for many, is a significant part of why the blame persists.
A Lesson for Future Leaders
Ultimately, the continued focus on Buhari’s legacy, even after his death, serves as a potent reminder for all politicians and public servants: death does not absolve leaders of their responsibilities. While forgiveness is a noble human trait, it should not overshadow the fundamental need for accountability in governance.
For Nigeria to progress, its leaders must understand that their actions, or inactions, will be scrutinized and judged, not just in their lifetime, but potentially for generations to come. This ongoing demand for accountability is not an act of malice; it is a critical step towards building a better Nigeria where leadership is truly about service, responsibility, and tangible progress.
May his soul rest in peace…
What are your thoughts on the delicate balance between forgiveness and accountability for leaders, especially after they’ve passed on?
0 Comments